a junior lawyer will try to understand the fact of a case from its root, learning what and how the case happened, why, when and where, thoroughly in order to find a few solutions to settle or ways to fight.
a junior doctor will get a case and ask a lot of questions, what they want and need to know about the case only.
yesterday, i was treated by a specialist, she came with a bunch of new doctors (in training maybe). before she came, the new doctors approached me and asked questions. they didn't ask according to the chronology, at 1 minute they ask what happened at the end, the other minute they ask what happened yesterday. and then what medicine i have taken.i tried to tell them extra info according to my chronology (my style of investigating facts, before coming to a conclusion and forming a legal advice for my clients), they said, takpe2, yg tu takpe..they didn't want to know.
when they came with the specialist, the specialist asked a lot of questions that the new doctors can't answer, had they listened to me before, they should been able to answer (proudly) all questions but they didn't. kesian sgt, tp when the specialist asked me (the patient), i answered her directly. the new doctors said, eh tak ckp pun?..i tried people, i did, but u didn't listen..hmmm too bad..
not that i'm forming a conclusion that lawyers are better than doctors, but, this is only 1 fact that we lawyers are better at. (in gathering infomation)
by the way in my case, the doctors did do their job excellently, i am cured. thank u doctors :)!!! thank u thank u
No comments:
Post a Comment